From a liberal perspective, however, world government may not be a sound proposal to world order. The question of “how we will get there from here” has not been deeply thought by the world governmentalists; and as this question has been answered so far, it has a utopian character either by the consent, by conquest, or by the people’s initiative. 

The second flaw in world governmentalists’ domestic analogy has been the derivative of their first assumption. They not only have thought that government sustains order but also that it is the government’s having the monopoly of power which basically sustains order in domestic politics. For one thing, government does not in the first place have a monopoly of power.

Finally, another flaw in world governmentalists’ analogy may be the idea that domestic order has been sustained by governments through the enforcement of law on individuals and so world order could be sustained by the imposing of global laws on citizens of the new world. This was, in fact, the logical conclusion of world governmentalists’ plan of dismantling the state as the main political institution.

Therefore, the correct option is D.