Introduction to Law Deneme Sınavı Sorusu #571934

Men are mortal (major premise)
Socrates is a man (minor premise)
Therefore, Socrates is mortal. (conclusion)

According to this example, which legal reasoning can it be?


Deduction

Analogy

Argumenta a fortiori

Systematic interpretation

Certainty


Yanıt Açıklaması:

This example shows that the logical form the syllogism rests on is a process of inferring from
two given premises, a further proposition, i.e. the conclusion. The truth of the conclusion is believed to follow from the previous two premises. To put it in simple terms, the first statement constitutes the major premise, the second one the minor premise and the third one the conclusion.

Yorumlar
  • 0 Yorum