International organizations’ personality, especially compared to States which are sovereign actors and subjects, is a limited one. They can only act and function within the framework of their statutes. They cannot use powers exceeding the limits drawn therein. The exact scope of this functional and limited personality, however, is interpreted differently in the literature. Some argue that organizations can only use powers explicitly given to them in their statutes, which in fact means that the discretion of any organization is limited and it is the member States that still counts. Others, therefore, argue that organizations should be allowed to use implied powers that are, or might be, necessary to accomplish the goals set forth in the statutes. Finally, some go further and suggest that any power not forbidden in the statute might naturally be used especially by global organizations such as the UN. As none of these views respectively championing explicit, implied or natural powers secured a widespread support, it might be concluded that organizations have functional and limited personalities and they can act only within the limits drawn in their statutes. As can be understood from the information given, the correct answer is B. “Organizations should be allowed to use implied powers that are, or might be, necessary to accomplish the goals set forth in the statutes.” and “Any power not forbidden in the statute might naturally be used especially by global organizations such as the UN.” might be regarded as contradictory with international organizations’ limited personality.