Deneme Sınavı Soruları

vertical,monopoly

horizontal,oligopoly

horizontal, monoply

vertical,oligopoly

vertical, perfect competition

vertical merger

horizontal merger

cournot dupoly

duopoly

oligopoly

static efficiency 

dynamic efficiency

know-how

R&D activities

innovation

Horizontal product differentiation

Local product differentiation

Vertical product differentiation

Consumers' preferences product differentiation

Vertical demand differentiation

To regulate mergers and acquisitions that could potentially lessen competition in the market. 

To enforce strict price controls and regulatory incentives, particularly during the period between the two World Wars. 

To prohibit contracts, combinations, and conspiracies that restrained trade and to prevent monopolization and attempts to monopolize. 

To allow large companies to form cartels and trusts to stabilize prices and market conditions. 

To exclusively address concerns related to digital sectors and anticompetitive conducts within them.

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.8

Competitive pricing that benefits consumers by providing lower prices. 

Expansion of market share through internal efficiencies by a non-dominant firm. 

Predatory pricing, intended to deter entry or force the exit of competitors. 

Agreements between undertakings that promote innovation and technical advancement. 

Vertical agreements that improve the distribution efficiency of small-scale firms.

To set a fixed geographical boundary for where a product is sold and bought. 

To determine the monopolistic practices of a single dominant firm in the market. 

To outline the set of products and areas which exercise competitive constraint or pressure on each other. 

To implement the Hypothetical Monopolist Test (HMT) only in merger cases. 

To simplify the process of identifying barriers to entry and expansion in the market.

To promote its products - to wider audiences - to ensure that they have full knowledge
of their qualities.

To abonden its products - to wider products - to ensure that they have full knowledge
of their qualities.

To abolish its products - to wider audiences - to ensure that they have little knowledge
of their qualities.

To promote its products - to constrict audiences - to ensure that they have less knowledge of their qualities.

To promote its auidences - to lessen products - to ensure that they have full knowledge
of their cheapness.

Cleaning

Supplying

Purchasing

Shopping

Bundling

Bundling sales

Tie-in sales

Long term sales

Constant sales

Marginal sales

0.5

0.6

0.8

2

4

Perfect competition

Monopsony

Duopoly

Monopoly

Oligopoly

Limit pricing / Capacity investment

Capacity investment / Predatory pricing

Predatory pricing / Limit pricing 

Limit pricing / First-mover advantage

First-mover advantage / Limit pricing

Capacity expansion

Predatory conduct

Entry deterrence

Price fixing agreements

Log-normal distribution

Comparative statics and equilibrium solutions

Perfect competition and monopoly

Full information and market dominance

Consumer surplus and producer surplus

Consumer preferences and factor endowments

Sellers should have market power

The market should be divisible

Different markets should have different price elasticities of demand

There shoud be no resale (no arbitrage) principle

There should be crossovers between markets

Setting the same price for all customer groups

Adjusting prices based on production costs

Setting different prices for distinct customer groups based on their willingness to pay

Offering quantity discounts to all customers

Allowing customers to engage in resale (arbitrage)

Credible threats are effective in reducing competitors' profits, while non-credible threats have no impact

Non-credible threats are more powerful in influencing market structure compared to credible threats.

Credible threats are based on irrational behavior, while non-credible threats are rational strategies for firms

Firms, being rational actors, recognize that credible threats can reduce competitors' profits, making them effective.

Non-credible threats are solely focused on the firm's profit, whereas credible threats consider the overall market performance

Perfect competition

Monopolistic competition

Oligopoly

Monopoly

Monopsony