Deneme Sınavı Soruları

He assigns a major role in successful reconstruction.

The economic redevelopment, it was one of the stated goals of the Truman Doctrine.

He was expressed as an “help to free nations”.

Self-determination is a cardinal principle in modern international law.  

The right of the people of a particular place to choose the form of government they will have.

All states would need a regime in international relations.

The states are accepted as basic actors whereas the non-state actors are ignored.

Regime theory can only be applied to liberal states.

The non-state actors might be influential in political process.

Initiatives for cooperation would reflect the interest of powerful states instead of weak and small states.

to ensure a foreign exchange rate system

prevent competitive devaluation

encourage international trade

to build more factories

promote economic growth

British School

 British Institutionalists

International Society Approach

British Idealists and Rationalism

Cambridge International Society

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

Rawl insists that obligations accepted under such engagements must be performed force in general.

Rawl insists that social values as freedom, opportunity, income, wealth and respectfulness.

Rawl insists that obligations accepted under such engagements must be performed.

Rawl insists that emphasize that individuals and states must decide which rules would be binding.

Rawl insists that decision makers would reach a consensus for common values to be attained, some disagreements might arise for defining or conducting of these values.

Utilitarian philosophy

Social contract theory

Cosmopolitan understanding

Normative theory

Marxist theory

Only I

I and II

II and III

I and III

I, II and III

Napoleon

Jefferson

Roosevelt

Hobbes

Hegel

I, II, II

II, III, IV

I, II, IV

I, III, IV

I, II, III, IV

The acceptance of states as basic actors and ignorance of non-state actors criticism.

The criticism that functional theories cannot clearly explain where, why and when states cooperate.

The criticism that functional theories ignore power relations among states.

The criticism that regime theories are based on asymmetric relations among states.

The criticism that international regimes do not sufficiently explain unilateral actions that place states in greater security risks.

They consider International relations to be an autonomous subject rather than a part of (international) politics.

They examine order in the world in terms of the structure of relations between sovereign nation-states.

They have a common style that does not involve the use of statistics, geometry, algebra, and avoids the rhetoric of world issues such as poverty and monetary reform.

They are committed to holism in the sense that the whole is more than the summation of its parts.

They established that international relations as a field has existed for centuries, but has emerged as a subject field from the rise of colonialism.

reduce the uncertainties in certain fields

prevent any unfair applications stemming from uncertainties

faciliate the identification of violations of rules

increases the communication among sides

increase the likelyhood of conflict and chaos

The root of international relation is the struggle for interest.

The state is no longer the only actor.

Moral and ethical factors are disregarded.

Anarchical sturucture is the main feature of the system.

Peace reflects only the interwar period.

Only I

I and II

I and III

II and III

I, II and III

Politics is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature.

Statesmen conduct themselves in terms of interest defined as power.

Interest determines political conduct within the political and cultural context which foreign policy is formulated.

Prudence is the supreme virtue in international politics. There can be no political morality without prudence

The basic of governence is the importance given to the freedom of the individual.

Individualism

Freedom

Spontaneous law

Natural law

Rule of law

Classical realism in international relations stems from the international politics of ancient Greece while neorealism has proven to be the dominant theory of international relations since the end of the Second World War.

Classical realism is based on the progressive, liberal thought of idealism whereas neorealism emerged following the brute force political currents that were influential in the rise of national socialism in Germany in the 1930's and the consolidation of authoritarian political currents.

Classical realism emphasizes human nature and the self-interest of states, while neorealism emphasizes that the traits of states and statesmen will determine the balance of power in international relations.

Neorealism abandons the human nature aspect and statecraft ethics that are dominant in the classical realism approach to international relations, instead determining that the international systemic structure as a whole is determinant as it may constrain individual decision makers.

Classical realists see international relations as a result of external pressures shaping state policy and international relations, while neorealism implies that internal forces result in power struggles that shape international relations.

capitalists and proletariat

the lower class and the middle class

proletariat and the middle class

capitalists and the middle class

slaves and proletariat

Modelski

Galtung

Burton

Bull

Wallerstein