Deneme Sınavı Soruları

Albania

Montenegro

Kosovo

Serbia

Turkey

I and II

I, II and III 

II, III and IV

III and IV

I, III and IV

It undertakes to progressively improve their military capabilities.

It was stated that the said report was prepared with the aim of not replacing the European Security Strategy, but enhancing it.

It aims to enable the 28 member countries to carry more weight on the world stage than if they were to act alone.

In the TEU, the Petersberg tasks are interpreted very broadly.

It was emphasized that the CSDP was an integral part of the CFSP. 

the Single European Act (1986),

the Treaty of Maastricht (1992),

the Treaty of Zürich (1995),

the Treaty of Amsterdam (1997),

the Treaty of Lisbon (2007).

I and II

I, II and III

II, III and IV

III and IV

I and IV

the existence of functional international organizations that are free from national interests,

common interstate identities and values developed to establish international organizations and mechanisms to prevent wars,

spill-over, which means that cooperation or integration in a particular policy area can spread to other related policy areas because of the contact with each other,

spread of an integration process in one sector of the economy to other sectors of the economy, eventually cover the whole economy,

institutions playing an important role in determining behaviors and decisions of political actors.

Dissipation of tensions in Europe between the superpowers

European countries tended to establish close relations with the United States.

Nuclear and military capacity became less important.

Economic power and geographic location came into prominence

Nuclear and military capacity became more important than ever.

Albania

Turkey

England

Republic of North Macedonia

Montenegro

The origins of the CFSP don't lay in the European Political Cooperation (EPC).

It is not an official acknowledgement of the EPC.

The EPC was initiated as a means of coordinating the meetings of foreign  ministers.

Under the EPC, legislative activities were not allowed.

The EPC could not force any member state to participate in any action.

I & II.

I, II & III.

II & III.

Only II.

I & III.

Only I

Only II

I and II

II and III

I, II and III

10

16

20

26

32

the equal distribution of powers among the member states

the increasing contestation of the scope, level, or character of regional integration

the distribution of the conflicts between member states

the indication of a deeper structural change

the context of the EU’s recent polycrisis 

Policy integration;

Institutional integration;

Behavioral dimension

Security dimension

Attitudinal dimension.

interstate actor

intergovernmental treaty

separate union

disintegrated area

regulatory state

Increasing power of national governments.

Loss of national identity as laws, regulations, and standards are harmonized.

Loss of sovereignty and national independence.

Too little reference to public opinion regarding key decisions on integration.

Increased drug trafficking, crime and illegal immigration arising from the removal of border controls.

Institutional integration

Civilizing/security dimension 

Attitudinal dimension

Multi-method dimension

Mobility for citizens

Trade creation effect

Autarky