Publıc Internatıonal Law I Final 12. Deneme Sınavı
Toplam 20 Soru1.Soru
If any act occurs by an irresistable force or by an unforeseen event, which circumstance can a state take advantage of?
Consent |
Self-defense |
Countermeasure |
Force majeure |
Distress |
Force majeure as a defense is available only
where the following three elements are met:
• the act in question must be brought about
by an irresistible force or by an unforeseen
event,
• which is beyond the control of the State
concerned, and
• which makes it materially impossible in the
circumstances to perform the obligation
2.Soru
In which year was the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the UN General Assembly?
1945 |
1948 |
1953 |
1966 |
1968 |
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the General Assembly on December 10, 1948. It defined expressly certain human rights and fundamental freedoms that need to be protected.
3.Soru
Which of the following is an issue that the Draft does not deal with?
obligations of states arising out of permitted acts |
responsibilities of states to conduct wrongful acts |
definition of internationally wrongful acts |
determining which claims can be admitted |
determining which acts can be attributed to states |
The Draft deals only with the responsibility of states for conduct that is internationally wrongful. It does not deal with the obligations of states arising out of acts that are not prohibited and that may have been expressly permitted under international law (such as compensation for property duly taken for a public purpose). The Draft also does not deal with the responsibility of international organizations or of other non-state entities, including individuals.
4.Soru
In which article of the Draft Articles it is stated that “There is a breach of an international obligation by a state when an act of that state is not in conformity with what is required by that obligation, regardless of its origin or character”?
Article 9 |
Article 10 |
Article 11 |
Article 12 |
Article 13 |
“There is a breach of an international obligation by a state when an act of that state is not in conformity with what is required by that obligation, regardless of its origin or character” (Article 12, Draft Articles).
5.Soru
Which of the following is not part of the International Bill of Rights?
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights |
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights |
Optional Protocols to the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights |
Universal Declaration on Human Rights |
European Convention on Human Rights |
Among the human rights agreements, the most important are the two Covenants adopted by the General Assembly in 196.
a) the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its
two Optional Protocols, and
b) the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights.
These two Covenants, Optional Protocols to the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights together form the International Bill of Rights.
6.Soru
"The procedure employed by the State of nationality of the injured person to secure protection of that person, and to obtain reparation for the internationally wrongful act inflicted"
Which of the followings is the term described above?
Breach. |
Force majeure. |
An omission. |
Diplomatic protection. |
An internationally wrongful act. |
Diplomatic protection is the procedure employed by the State of nationality of the injured person to secure protection of that person, and to obtain reparation for the internationally wrongful act inflicted. Such protection extends to both natural and legal persons. Therefore, the correct option is D.
7.Soru
Which term refers to the jurisdiction of a court of law over a proposed action in relation to the passage of time?
Jurisdiction ratione temporis |
Prima facie responsibility |
Non-retrospectivity |
Ultra vires |
Jus cogens |
Jurisdiction ratione temporis (temporal jurisdiction) refers to the jurisdiction of a court of law over a proposed action in relation to the passage of time (USLegal.com).
8.Soru
Which crimes does a state have responsibility for in international law?
Serious breaches of peremptory norms of international law |
Civil responsibility |
Human rights law |
Genocide and war crimes |
Treatment of aliens |
As for the criminal responsibility of States under international law, it has not been clearly established or accepted, even though the act is criminal in nature such as genocide or war crimes.
9.Soru
I. obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force as embodied in the Charter of the United Nations,
II. obligations for the protection of local national laws,
III. obligations of a humanitarian character prohibiting reprisals.
Which of the ones stated above is among the points that cannot suspended by countermeasures?
Only I. |
I & III. |
Only II. |
I, II & III. |
Only III. |
Countermeasures shall not affect, that is, cannot suspend:
• the obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force as embodied in the Charter of the United Nations,
• obligations for the protection of fundamental human rights,
• obligations of a humanitarian character prohibiting reprisals,
• other obligations under peremptory norms of general international law
Therefore, the correct option is B.
10.Soru
The first human rights document that has emphasized the “third generation” rights is:
The Asia Cooperation Dialogue. |
The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. |
The American Convention on Human Rights. |
The African Charter on Human Rights and Peoples’ Rights. |
The Arab Charter on Human Rights. |
The heads of the Organization of African Unity adopted the African Charter on Human Rights (also known as the Banjul Charter) on 17 June 1981. The Charter came into effect on 21 October 1986. As of 2016, all the 54 member states of the African Union have ratified the Charter. This is the first human rights document that has emphasized the peoples’ rights (Arts. 19- 24), i.e., the “third generation” rights, viz., right to self-determination, right to development, the right to freely dispose of their wealth and natural resources etc.
11.Soru
Which criminal jurisdiction principle refers to jurisdiction according to the national interest of the state injured by the offence?
The territorial principle |
The nationality principle |
The protective principle |
The defensive principle |
The universality principle |
The state practice discloses four general principles on the basis of which states generally claim criminal jurisdiction. The protective principle refers to jurisdiction according to the national interest of the state injured by the offence.
12.Soru
The surrender by one state to another of a person accused of committing an offence in the latter.
Which of the followings is the term described above?
Alien. |
Jurisic Person. |
Forum. |
Local forum. |
Extradition. |
Extradition: The surrender by one state to another of a person accused of committing an offence in the latter. Therefore, the correct option is E.
13.Soru
Which of the followings claims the individual has no status in international law?
Natural Law Theory. |
Positivism. |
The Marxist Approach. |
The Sociological Approach. |
The Modern Approach. |
Under this theory, rules of international law are merely rules of positive morality. According to positivists, the individual has no status in international law. Therefore, the correct option is B.
14.Soru
I. Aircraft hijacking,
II. Trafficking in women and children,
III. Kidnapping of diplomats and taking of hostages,
IV. Trafficking in narcotic drugs, counterfeiting of currency.
Which of the ones listed above is among the international crimes.
I & II. |
I, II & III. |
II & III. |
II, III & IV. |
I, II, III & IV. |
The conclusion of numerous other treaties have made the following acts international crimes: aircraft hijacking, unlawful acts against the safety of civil aviation, trafficking in women and children, trafficking in narcotic drugs, counterfeiting of currency, kidnapping of diplomats and taking of hostages. Therefore, the correct option is E.
15.Soru
What is it called when a state exercises its jurisdiction beyond its territory?
Criminal Jurisdiction |
Civil Jurisdiction |
Territorial Jurisdiction |
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction |
Exclusive Jurisdiction |
As a rule, every state exercises exclusive jurisdiction within its own territory. However, International law does not put any limitation on the state’s power to exercise jurisdiction beyond its territorial limits. When a state exercises its jurisdiction beyond its territory, it is called extraterritorial jurisdiction.
16.Soru
Which one of the following is not among the four general principles on the basis of which states generally claim criminal jurisdiction?
territorial |
nationality |
protective |
universality |
substantial |
The state practice discloses four general principles on the basis of which states generally claim criminal jurisdiction; territorial principle, nationality principle, protective principle, universality principle
17.Soru
What is the term which means "what is just and fair or according to equity and good conscience"?
Non-lique |
Opinio juris sive necessitatis |
Erga omnes obligations |
Ex aequo et bono |
Res judicata |
Ex aequo et bono means what is just and fair or according to equity and good conscience.
18.Soru
Which of the following is true regarding the International Criminal Court?
The attempts to establish an international permanent criminal court started in 1945. |
The International Criminal Court was created under the Geneva Statute adopted in 2002. |
The International Criminal Court consists of 10 judges. |
Judges shall hold office for a term of five years and can be re-elected. |
The judges shall be elected by secret ballot at a meeting of the Assembly of States Parties. |
The ICC consists of 18 judges. The number may be increased on a proposal of the Presidency, indicating the reasons for the increase. The judges shall be elected by secret ballot at a meeting of the Assembly of States Parties. Judges shall hold office for a term of nine years and shall not be eligible for re-election.
19.Soru
Which of the following is one of the counts listed in the Charter of Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals?
Crimes against peace |
War crimes |
Propaganda crimes |
Crimes against humanity |
Conspiracy |
The Charter of Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals had four counts of offenses:
• Crimes against peace, i.e., beginning a war of aggression by planning, preparation or initiation, or in violation of treaties, such as the Hague Conventions of 1899, 1907, the Treaty of Versailles, violation of Mutual Non-aggression Pact by Germany with France, Belgium and Poland, and the 1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact.
• War crimes, i.e., crimes under the laws of war, which included violation of customary and conventional rules and regulations relating to warfare.
• Crimes against humanity, i.e., inhuman treatment (murder or persecution) on racial or religious grounds during war and in occupied territories.
• Conspiracy to commit these crimes
20.Soru
Which of the characteristics below are the ones an agreement should have in order to be considered as a treaty?
I. It should be embodied in a written instrument at least between three entities.
II.Those entities should be endowed with international personality
III. It should be governed by international law
II and III |
I and III |
III |
I and II |
II |
Irrespective of the form or terminology of a particular instrument, an agreement should have
the following characteristics to be considered as a treaty:
• it should be embodied in a written
instrument between two or more
entities;
• those entities should be endowed with
international personality; and
• it should be governed by international law.
-
- 1.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 2.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 3.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 4.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 5.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 6.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 7.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 8.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 9.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 10.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 11.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 12.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 13.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 14.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 15.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 16.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 17.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 18.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 19.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ
- 20.SORU ÇÖZÜLMEDİ