CEVAP:

In “the benevolent leadership model,” the global hegemon provides international public goods such as stability and peace. The hegemon bears all the costs of maintaining the systemic order, but it gains relatively less than subordinate states that act as free riders in the system. However, in “the coercive leadership model,” the hegemon provides international public goods but forces subordinate states to share the burden of providing the public goods and sustaining the international order. The benevolent hegemonic order, Snidal argues, involves a higher level of cooperation as well as positive sanctions (rewards), while the coercive hegemonic order is more about a high level of enforcement and negative sanctions (threats) (Snidal, 1985: 585-590). Snidal concludes that hegemony can be “benevolent, coercive but still beneficial, or simply exploitative” (1985: 614).