POLITICAL THOUGHT (SİYASAL DÜŞÜNCELER) - (İNGİLİZCE) Dersi Radicals of Political Thought in the 19th Century soru detayı:
SORU:
What are the main differences between Anarchism and Marxism?
CEVAP: • For anarchists, the main source of social injustice is the existence of the state. Hence, all kinds of state ideologies should be rejected. State is not necessary. It is indeed harmful and hindering for human progress. Marxists, on the other hand, think that the state is an end-product of the class conflict. They think that the capitalist state must first be overthrown to defeat capitalism.
• The ruling class in Marxism is considered rather in narrow economic terms. In anarchism, the ruling class that exploits and oppresses the masses consists of those who have any kind of privilege in society, including but not limited to the wealth and power.
• According to Marxism, political organization and political leadership are necessary for working class. Political leaders function as theoreticians, helpers, spokesmen, directors, and so forth. However, according to anarchists, political leadership is also a source of oppression such as state itself.
• For anarchists, the main source of social injustice is the existence of the state. Hence, all kinds of state ideologies should be rejected. State is not necessary. It is indeed harmful and hindering for human progress. Marxists, on the other hand, think that the state is an end-product of the class conflict. They think that the capitalist state must first be overthrown to defeat capitalism.
• The ruling class in Marxism is considered rather in narrow economic terms. In anarchism, the ruling class that exploits and oppresses the masses consists of those who have any kind of privilege in society, including but not limited to the wealth and power.
• According to Marxism, political organization and political leadership are necessary for working class. Political leaders function as theoreticians, helpers, spokesmen, directors, and so forth. However, according to anarchists, political leadership is also a source of oppression such as state itself.