Theorıes Of Internatıonal Relatıons I Deneme Sınavı Sorusu #1405261
Which one is a correct argument about the British Committee?
|
The Committee was composed of scholars coming from different disciplines. |
|
The British Committee met for the first time in 1959 and then worked well into the mid-1980s. Initially the Committee met 6 times a year. |
|
In time, no other scholars participated in the meetings of the Committee. |
|
The penultimate work that came out of the working of the Committee was published in 1981. |
|
The Expansion of International Society, edited by William Armstrong. |
The British Committee met for the first time in 1959 and then worked well into the mid-1980s. Initially the Committee met 3 times a year and discussed the selected issues over a week. In time we see other scholars participate in the meetings of the Committee and also scholars who were inspired by the workings of the Committee such as R.J. Vincent, M. Donelan, J. Mayall, A. James, G. Gong, to name but a few. Martin Wight and Hedley Bull have come to be recognized as the most prominent scholars among the authors of the English School.
The British Committee worked in the way that members prepared and distributed draft papers among themselves and then they discussed them over a week. The first publication of the Committee came out in 1966, titled Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, edited by Butterfield and Wight. In addition to Butterfield and Wight, the book included contributions by other members of the Committee such as Bull, Howard and MacKinnon. The penultimate work that came out of the working of the Committee was published in 1984, titled The Expansion of International Society, edited by Bull and Watson. In-between, we see various works, either collective or individually authored, by members of the Committee or authors inspired by the works of the Committee. It is fair to say that the British Committee thus led to the formation of a body of works, which we now consider as the output of the English School of International Relations.
When one examines the composition and the working of the British Committee, some of the premises and arguments of the English School can be discerned. The Committee was composed of scholars coming from different disciplines, not just those coming from the discipline of IR.
Yorumlar
- 0 Yorum