Turkish Polıtıcs Deneme Sınavı Sorusu #1024563

I. It can be seen as a hard constitutional document.

II. There were some laws that didn't allow Assembly to make changes.

III. The supremacy of the constitution over the laws was recognised.

Which of the above is correct regarding the Constitution of 1924?


Only I

Only II

I and II

II and III

I, II and III


Yanıt Açıklaması:

The constitution of 1924 can be regarded as a hard constitutional document. In order to enact a constitutional law, a legislative proposal had to be offered by one-third of the assembly and had to be adopted by two-thirds of the majority. There were some articles of the Constitution of 1924 that didn’t allow the Assembly to make changes. The supremacy of the constitution over ordinary laws was recognized as well and other ordinary laws were supposed to be compatible with the constitution articles. All three statements are correct.

Yorumlar
  • 0 Yorum